Changes

::::: Approproaite is another term that can be used and reflects this contextual in nature --[[User:GregBro|Gregb]]^{[[User talk:GregBro|talk]]} 11:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

::::: Approproaite is another term that can be used and reflects this contextual in nature --[[User:GregBro|Gregb]]^{[[User talk:GregBro|talk]]} 11:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

: Adding one more element of thought on the ambiguity of the term "granularity", here. As mentioned in the corresponding [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granularity Wikipedia article (16 Mar 2021)]: ''"Note that, although the modifying terms, fine and coarse are used consistently across all fields, the term granularity is not"'', and ''"In investing: more granularity refers to more positions of smaller size"'', but ''"In photography: more granular photographic film has fewer and larger chemical "grains" (similarly, more granular sugar has fewer and larger grains)"''. Of the two examples, my opinion is that the latter is only apparently opposite to the former. In fact, in photography the term "granular" refers to a picture in which grains are visible, meaning that they are there, as opposed to one in which they are not visible, then they are not ("te video/sentio ergo es" applies, and the fact that they could be spotted microscopically is pragmatically irrelevant here). Equally for sugar. -----[[User:LucaOrlassino|<span style="background-color: #EAECEE; color: #134365; font-family: Helvetica, Sans-serif;">Luca Orlassino</span>]]^{[[User talk:LucaOrlassino|<small style="color: #566573; font-family: Bodoni, Serif;">T-A-L-K</small>]]} 14:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

: Adding one more element of thought on the ambiguity of the term "granularity", here. As mentioned in the corresponding [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granularity Wikipedia article (16 Mar 2021)]: ''"Note that, although the modifying terms, fine and coarse are used consistently across all fields, the term granularity is not"'', and ''"In investing: more granularity refers to more positions of smaller size"'', but ''"In photography: more granular photographic film has fewer and larger chemical "grains" (similarly, more granular sugar has fewer and larger grains)"''. Of the two examples, my opinion is that the latter is only apparently opposite to the former. In fact, in photography the term "granular" refers to a picture in which grains are visible, meaning that they are there, as opposed to one in which they are not visible, then they are not ("te video/sentio ergo es" applies, and the fact that they could be spotted microscopically is pragmatically irrelevant here). Equally for sugar. -----[[User:LucaOrlassino|<span style="background-color: #EAECEE; color: #134365; font-family: Helvetica, Sans-serif;">Luca Orlassino</span>]]^{[[User talk:LucaOrlassino|<small style="color: #566573; font-family: Bodoni, Serif;">T-A-L-K</small>]]} 14:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)