Talk:3-points
Again change this to Three points contextualistion --GregBro (talk) 10:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
I think there is confusion here between data sets and exmplars - if data sets then the prep needs rehashing - --GregBro (talk) 15:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- With exemplars I am referring to the 3 items from the data set which are selected by the group as most suitable for the Ordered / Complex / Chaotic points that span the playground, and the statements that are used to identify the points - not the same thing as data sets generated beforehand tried to clarify that part -Björn Schwenninger (talk) 15:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- That is what I suspected so we need to rehash this and differentiate between the two to avoid ambiguity - --GregBro (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, Greg - --Björn Schwenninger (talk) 13:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Point exemplar kit to the kits page for now - --GregBro (talk) 12:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Haved added some guidance on group size but this should really be on the complex facilitation page - --GregBro (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Proposal just discussed in the 3-Points Study Group meeting with Dave: What about establishing the 3-Points wiki page as the main page for establishing Cynefin and linking 4-Points and Linear only from the 3-Points. This would allow to describe on 4-Points/Linear pages only the differences to 3-Points (saving a lot of copied text), and it establishes the primary method more clearly. We might just go ahead and give it try on the temporary pages. - --Björn Schwenninger (talk) 13:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Sandbox page created for ThreePointer discussion group --Khurshid (talk) 10:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Workflow testing
I wanted to test the workflow in order to feedback, but am confused as to whether the question being assessed needs to be closed question, or open one? Maybe a sample video of this flow being attached would be useful? -- --RaviJoshi (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC) -- --RaviJoshi (talk) 14:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Stage 1 - Did we mean to imply that maximising groupthink is the way to get diverse answers?
- RaviJoshi I'm not sure I follow what you're asking: "[...] the question being assessed needs to be closed question, or open one?". Which question is that?
- In relation to Stage 1: If I understand correctly what you ask, maybe you don't need an explanation so my apologies if that's not what you want. The logic behind the comment is this one: if you have different groups and each group is formed with people who think alike, then each group will produce very diverse outcomes. So when you'll compare what group A produced, with what group B produced and what group C produced, you'll have diverse answers. Whereas if you go with homogeneous groups, you'll get already filtered out outcomes. So less diversity between the groups. Again, apologies if it was very clear for you and you were asking something else. --Corinalupu (talk) 18:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Sandbox
Asked Jay to remove https://cynefin.io/wiki/3-points/sandbox as there is no content --GregBro